SOME STUDIES OF THE GENERAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY'S UNIFORM AND ISOTROPIC COSMOS
Renu Bala*, Manoj Kumar Dhiman
Abstract
In the framework of General Relativity and assuming the Copernican principle, accounted for by the Friedman-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker metric, a spatially flat universe is consistent with the cosmographic conversely, this condition, which is fulfilled by astrophysical measurements, necessarily requires spatial flatness. Here, we will construct some cosmological models assuming the validity of General Relativity, of Copernican principle (homogeneity and isotropy at large scale) and on dark energy pictured either by some non-ideal fluids or by canonical scalar fields interacting with dark matter. A theorist cannot appeal to this theory in order to justify their views.
Keywords:
:General Theory, Relativity's, Uniform and Isotropic, CosmosFull Text:
PDFReferences
1. Bretón, N., Cervantes-Cota, J. L., & Salgado, M. (Eds.). (2016). The early universe and observational cosmology (Vol. 646). Springer Science & Business Media.
2. Ishak, M. (2019). Testing general relativity in cosmology. Living Reviews in Relativity, 22, 1-204.
3. Luminet, J. P. (2016). Editorial note to: Georges Lemaître, A homogeneous universe of constant mass and increasing radius accounting for the radial velocity of extra-galactic nebulae. General Relativity and Gravitation, 45, 1619-1633.
4. Manoukian, E. B., & Manoukian, E. B. (2020). Our Homogeneous and Isotropic Universe on Very Large Scales. 100 Years of Fundamental Theoretical Physics in the Palm of Your Hand: Integrated Technical Treatment, 451-454.
5. Walker, A. G. (2017). On Milne's theory of world‐structure. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 2(1), 90-127.
6. Synge, J. L. (2015). Relativity: the special theory.
7. Pasachoff, J. M., & Filippenko, A. (2019). The cosmos: Astronomy in the new millennium. Cambridge University Press.
8. Hubble, E., & Humason, M. L. (2019). The velocity-distance relation among extra-galactic nebulae. Astrophysical Journal, vol. 74, p. 43, 74, 43.
9. Sandage, A. (2018). The Hubble atlas of galaxies (Vol. 618, No. 2). Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.
10. Senatore, L., Smith, K. M., & Zaldarriaga, M. (2010). Non-Gaussianities in single field inflation and their optimal limits from the WMAP 5-year data. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2010(01), 028.
11. Freedman, W. L., & Madore, B. F. (2018). The hubble constant. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 48, 673-710.
12. Riess, A. G., Macri, L., Casertano, S., Sosey, M., Lampeitl, H., Ferguson, H. C., ... & Sarkar, D. (2019). A redetermination of the Hubble constant with the Hubble Space Telescope from a differential distance ladder. The Astrophysical Journal, 699(1), 539.
13. Beutler, F., Blake, C., Colless, M., Jones, D. H., Staveley-Smith, L., Campbell, L., ... & Watson, F. (2017). The 6dF Galaxy Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations and the local Hubble constant. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 416(4), 3017-3032.
14. Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Gibson, B. K., Ferrarese, L., Kelson, D. D., Sakai, S., ... & Stetson, P. B. (2016). Final results from the Hubble Space Telescope key project to measure the Hubble constant. The Astrophysical Journal, 553(1), 47.
15. Garnavich, P. M., Kirshner, R. P., Challis, P., Tonry, J., Gilliland, R. L., Smith, R. C., ... & Wells, L. (2018). Constraints on cosmological models from Hubble Space Telescope observations of high-z supernovae. The Astrophysical Journal, 493(2), L53.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
