THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CALL-BASED INSTRUCTION AND ITS INFLUENCE ON THE LEARNERS IN AN EXAMPLE OF TSUL (TASHKENT STATE UNIVERSITY OF LAW)

Abstract This paper based on the research discusses the use of CALL-Computer-Assisted Language Learning, particularly during the pandemic, and its effects on the students of Tashkent state university of law. Indeed, the main purpose of the study is to compare the results of the final assessment before and during the pandemic which led to online teaching and learning, provide its holistic image, and present the overall opinion of the students on this mode of education. For this reason, it initially introduces the brief history, typology, and use of CALL in education apart from the views of different scholars. It also involves both primary and secondary data including observation and questionnaire methods. For the comparison, the researcher applied both qualitative and quantitative methods with the analysis of the results, and it was found that the integration of CALL into the ongoing education is the most preferable alternative during the pandemic owing to a safe environment, better computer awareness, and time management.

Keywords:

CALL, online education, computers, apps, programs, activities, multimedia, technology-based instruction, a final assessment

o Bax, S. (2003). CALL-past, present, and future. The system, 31 (1). P.13-28.
o Beatty, K. (2003). Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning. Harlow: Longman.
o Byron, G. (1990). A tool for language learning. Computer-assisted language learning, 2 (1). P. 83-91.
o Chapelle, C. (2001). Computer Applications in Second language acquisition: Foundations for testing, teaching, and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
o Serim, F & Koch, M. (1996). Net learning: why teachers use the internet. Sebastopol, CA.
o Jones, C & Fortesque, S. (1987). Using computers in the language classroom. London: Longman.
o Katushemererwe, F & Nerbonne, J. (2015). Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) in Support of (Re)-Learning Native Languages: The Case of Runyakitara. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28 (2). P. 112-129.
o Miftachudin, M. (2012). The role of Computer Assisted Language Learning for English Language Learning of Elementary and High Language Schools in Indonesia. Register Journal, 5 (2).
o Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during the lockdown period of the COVID-19 pandemic. Educational Journal of Research Open. www.elsivier.com/locate/ijedro
o Richards, J.C & Rodgers, T.S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
o Tafazoli, D., &Golshan, N. (2014). Review of computer-assisted languages: History, merits & barriers. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ijll
o Warschauer, M. (2001). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and Practice. The modern language journal, 81 (4). P. 470-481.
o Warschauer, M &Healey, D. (1998). Computer and Language Learning: An overview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
o http://www2.nkfust.edu.tw/~emchen/CALL/unit1.htm
o https://efidrew.wordpress.com/
o https://wirhayati.wordpress.com/