ANALYSIS OF THE NEED FOR DEVELOPMENT OF TECHNOLOGICAL ANDRAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE TRAINING MODEL (TACK) EQUALITY EDUCATION TUTORS

Vevi Sunarti*, Jamaris, Solfema, Mega Iswari, Abna Hidayati
Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia, *Email: vevisunarti.pls@fip.unp.ac.id

Abstract

: The development of training models needs to be developed at this time, to improve the Technological Andragogical and Content Knowledge (TACK) skills of equality education tutors. This research aims to analyze the tutor's knowledge of TACK skills and see how much equivalence education tutors need to improve their TACK skills. The development method used in this research is the Research and Development (R & D) method with the Critical Event Model (CEM) model. The test results can be concluded that 1) the CK test are still low; 2) AK test results are still low; 3) TK test results are still low; 4) ACK test results are still low; 5) TCK test results are still low; 6) TAK test results are still low; 7) TACK test results are still low; and 8) 87% of equality education tutors require training to improve TACK skills.

Keywords:

:Needs Analyst, Technological, Andragogical, Content, Knowledge and Training.


Full Text:

PDF


References


Admodiwirio, S. (2010). Manajemen Pengawasan, Supervise Sekolah. Jakarta: PT. Ardadidya Jaya. Afriza, A., & Adisantoso, J. (2018). Metode Klasifikasi Rocchio untuk Analisis Hoax. Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Agri-Informatika, 5(1), 1-10. (In Indonesia) Akyuz, D. (2018). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through performance assessment. Computers & Education, 125, 212-225. Anwar, M., Oentoe, F., Senduk, J., & Sumual, H. (2019). The Management Model of Conducting Education and Training in The Technical Field of Education and Religion; International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 9(7), 82-94. Boggs, G. R. (2019). What is the learning paradigm?. 13 ideas that are transforming the community college world, 33-51. Brockmann, M., Clarke, L., & Winch, C. (2008). Knowledge, skills, competence: European divergences in vocational education and training (VET)—the English, German and Dutch cases. Oxford review of education, 34(5), 547-567. Danial, A. D., Syaefudin, S. S., & Yuliani, L. Y. (2018). Pelatihan “Andragogical Content Knowledge” Bagi Tutor Kesetaraan Paket C dalam Meningkatkan Kompetensi Personal Proses Pembelajaran pada Peserta Didik di Pusat Kegiatan Belajar Masyarakat (PKBM) Gema Kelurahan Cikalang Kecamatan Tawang Kota Tasikmalaya. Abdimas Siliwangi, 1(2), 89-95. (In Indonesia). Danim, S. (2010). Profesionalisasi dan etika profesi guru. Bandung: Alfabeta. (In Indonesia). Drummond, A., & Sweeney, T. (2017). Can an objective measure of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) supplement existing TPACK measures?. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(4), 928-939. Dyah, M. M. M., Mustakim, M., & Ismail, I. (2022). The Correlation between Teachers’ Personality and Students’ Motivation in Learning English. MAJESTY JOURNAL, 4(2), 20-30. Gian, P., & Bao, D. (2021). The Competences of Teaching Staff and Principals in the Context of Educational Innovation and School Development. International Education Studies, 14(1), 65-75. Hendayat, S. (2005). Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran (Teori, Permasalahan dan Praktik). Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang. (In Indonesia). Jonathans, P. M., & Metboki, Y. (2021). Reflecting on EFL Digital Learning in Indonesia: Seeking for E-Learning Pedagogy. Atlantis Press, 259-263. Karahasan. (2010). Preservice Secondary Mathematics Teachers ‟Pedagogical Content Knowledge Of Composite And Inverse Functions. Doctoral Dissertation., Secondary Science and Mathematics Education Department, Middle East Technical University: Turki. Knowles, M. S. (1979). Speaking from Experience: The Professional Organization as a Learning Community. Training and Development Journal, 33(5), 36-40. Knowles, M. (1996). Andragogy: An emerging technology for adult learning. Boundaries of adult learning, 82-98. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?. Journal of education, 193(3), 13-19. Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), 60-70. Koyuncuoglu, Ö. (2021). An Investigation of Graduate Students' Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK). International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(2), 299-313. Kulgemeyer, C., & Riese, J. (2018). From professional knowledge to professional performance: The impact of CK and PCK on teaching quality in explaining situations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(10), 1393-1418. Li, Q., Bañuelos, M., Liu, Y., & Xu, D. (2022). Online instruction for a humanized learning experience: Techniques used by college instructors. Computers & Education, 104595. Lindeman, E. (1926). The meaning of adult education. New Republic, Incorporated. Loewenberg Ball, D., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?. Journal of teacher education, 59(5), 389-407. Lowe, J. (1975). The education of adults: a world perspective. Paris (France); Ontario Inst. for Studies in Education, Toronto. Lunandi, A. G. (1989). Komunikasi mengena: meningkatan efektivitas komunikasi antar pribadi. Penerbit Kanisius. (In Indonesia). Marzuki, S. (2010). Pendidikan Nonformal Dimensi Dalam Keaksaraan Fungsional, Pelatihan, dan Andragogi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. (In Indonesia). Muhammad, R. R., Lawson, D., Aslam, F., & Crawford, M. (2022). The Scientific Approach of The Indonesian 2013 Curriculum: A Comparison with Other Active Learning Strategies in Mathematics. Technology, 5(2), 155-171. Mulastin, M., Samsudi, S., & Rusdarti, R. (2016). Developing an Education & Integrated Critical Event Model (ICEM) Research Training by Using a Mentoring Strategy for Health College Lecturers. The Journal of Educational Development, 4(1), 8-15. Papanikolaou, K., Makri, K., & Roussos, P. (2017). Learning design as a vehicle for developing TPACK in blended teacher training on technology enhanced learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-14. Parr, J. M., & Ward, L. (2011). The teacher’s laptop as a hub for learning in the classroom. Journal of research on technology in education, 44(1), 53-73. Purwoko, R. Y. (2017). Urgensi Pedagogical content Knowledge Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Surya Edukasi (JPSE), 3(2), 42-55. Rasa, T., & Laherto, A. (2022). Young people’s technological images of the future: implications for science and technology education. European Journal of Futures Research, 10(1), 1-15. Rondinone, B. M., Valenti, A., Boccuni, V., Cannone, E., Boccuni, F., Gagliardi, D., & Iavicoli, S. (2022). Global policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic: results of the ICOH survey. Safety and Health at Work. Rukajat, A. (2018). Pendekatan penelitian kuantitatif: quantitative research approach. Deepublish. (In Indonesia). Saprianto, D., & Solfema, S. (2019). Gambaran Penerapan Prinsip Andragogi dalam Performansi Widyaiswara pada Kegiatan Pendidikan dan Pelatihan. Journal of Family, Adult, and Early Childhood Education, 1(3), 293–300. (In Indonesia) Scanlan, C. S., & Darkenwald, G. G. (1984). Identifying deterrents to participation in continuing education. Adult education quarterly, 34(3), 155-166. Schmid, M., Brianza, E., & Petko, D. (2020). Developing a short assessment instrument for Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK. xs) and comparing the factor structure of an integrative and a transformative model. Computers & Education, 157, 103967. Septiyanti, M., Inderawati, R., & Vianty, M. (2020). Technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) perception of English education students. English Review: Journal of English Education, 8(2), 165-174. Shinas, V. H., Yilmaz-Ozden, S., Mouza, C., Karchmer-Klein, R., & Glutting, J. J. (2013). Examining domains of technological pedagogical content knowledge using factor analysis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(4), 339-360. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4-14. Sileyew, K. J. (2019). Research design and methodology (pp. 1-12). Rijeka: IntechOpen. Singerin, S. (2022). The Effect Supervision on Teacher Performance through TPACK as Mediating Variable. Sch J Arts Humanit Soc Sci, 2, 39-51. Soedomo, M. (1989). Pendidikan Luar Sekolah ke Arah Pengembangan Sistem Belajar Masyarakat. Jakarta: Depdikbud. (In Indonesia). Solfema, S. (2013). Pengasuhan Orangtua, Budaya Sekolah, Budaya Masyarakat, dan Empati Anak Usia Remaja. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Malang, 19(2), 106022. (In Indonesia). Sugiyono, (2012). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta. (In Indonesia). Tamat, T. (1984). Dari pedagogik ke andragogik. Jakarta: Pustaka Dian. (In Indonesia). Taylor, E., Gillborn, D., & Ladson-Billings, G. (2009). Foundations of critical race theory in education. Routledge. Thompson, K., Alhadad, S. S., Shum, S. B., Howard, S., Knight, S., Martinez-Maldonado, R., & Pardo, A. (2018). Connecting expert knowledge in the design of classroom learning experiences. Learning Analytics in the Classroom. Routledge. 111-128. Tri, N. M., & Dung, N. T. (2022). Impact of the industrial revolution 4.0 on Vietnamese cultural development. Linguistics and Culture Review, 6(1), 43-54. Wijaya, T. T., Ying, Z., & Purnama, A. (2020). The empirical research of hawgent dynamic mathematics technology integrated into teaching fraction in primary school. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 144-150. Yarrow, N., Khairina, N., Cilliers, J., & Dini, I. (2022). The Digital Future of Teacher Training in Indonesia. World Bank, Washington, DC. © World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/37218 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.”

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.