CHANGING POWER RELATIONS IN PALESTINIAN CIVIL SOCIETY UNDER THE ISRAELI OCCUPATION

Nadia Abu Zaher College of Administrative Sciences, Al-Istiqlal University – Palestine nadia.abuzaher@pass.ps, Orcid: 0000-0002-2476-5943
Sameh Al-Qubaj College of Administrative Sciences, Al-Istiqlal University – Palestine samehrq@pass.ps, Orcid: 0000-0003-0273-0771

Abstract

: The study aims to identify the development of power relations in Palestinian civil society. The study adopted the ‘power cube’ approach that illustrates power relations in the public sphere. The study relied primarily on the interview as a tool for gathering information, especially from leaders of the popular committees, participants in the first intifada, and civil society professionals. The study concluded that Palestinian civil society's power relations were changing and evolving through various political stages that affected it in light of its subjugation under the Israeli occupation. Power relations in civil society during the pre-Oslo stage were "parallel" to the occupying power; because the role of civil society was positive to compensate for the role of the absent Palestinian Authority, and its most prominent components were the popular committees. During the post-Oslo stage, the power relations in the civil society were "confrontational" relations with the Palestinian Authority, due to its opposition to many of its actions. The Popular Committees, its most prominent components, disappeared and were replaced by non-governmental organizations, which were funded from abroad serving foreign agendas so their positive role essentially declined. Post-division between Hamas and Fateh phase, power relations in civil society were characterized by "Domination"; as civil society was dominated by each of Gaza’s authority, and by Ramallah’s authority. The role of civil society in this regard has become at its most vulnerable.

Keywords:

:Palestinian civil society, Power cube approach, Power relations, Domination, Parallel, Confrontation.


Full Text:

PDF


References


• Anheier, Helmut (2004) Civil Society: Measurement, Evaluation, Policy, London: Earthscan. • Backscheider, Paula ‏, Dykstal ,Timothy (2013) “Introduction” in Paula Backscheider‏، Timothy Dykstal‏ (eds.) The Intersections of the Public and Private Spheres in Early Modern England, London: Routledge, 22- 40. • Brown, Nathan (2003) "Palestinian civil society in theory and practice", Paper for the Annual Meeting of the Structure of Government, Section 1, International Political Science Association. Washington D.C. • EL-Sayed Said, Mohamed (2005) "Global Civil Society: An Arab Perspective," in Marlies Glasius, Helmut K. Anheier and Mary Kaldor (eds.) Global Civil Society 2004/5. London: Sage Publications, 60-72. • Gaventa, John (2007) " Level, spaces and forms of power: analyzing opportunities for change", in Felix Bernskoetter, M.J. Williams (eds.) Power in World Politics, London: Routledge, 204-225. • Górski, Eugeniusz‏ (2007) Civil Society, Pluralism, and Universalism: Polish Philosophical Studies, VIII, Washington, D.C.: The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy. • Hassassian, Manuel (2002) "NGOS in the context of national struggle." in Benjamin Gidron, Stanley N. Katz and Yeheskel Hasenfeld (eds), Mobilizing for Peace: Conflict Resolution in Northern Ireland, Israel/Palestine, and South Africa, Oxford :Oxford University Press, 130-150. • Howardn Marc (2003) The Weakness of Civil Society in Post- Communist Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. • Jamal, Amaney (2007) Barriers to Democracy: The Other Side of Social Capital in Palestine and the Arab World, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. • Jessop, Bob (2020) Putting Civil Society in Its Place: Governance, Metagovernance and Subjectivity, UK: Bristol University Press. • Krishna, Anirudh (2000) "Creating and harnessing social capital", in Partha Dasgupta, Ismail Serageldin (eds.) Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective. Washington. D.C.: The World Bank, 71-93. • Kumbura, Necma, Pande ,Vincent (2018) “Decentralization and Local Governance in Tanzania: Theories and Practice on Sustainable”, in Kassa Alemu, Mulunesh Albachew (eds.), Handbook of Research on Sustainable Development and Governance Strategies for economic growth in Africa, USA: IGI Global, 131-148. • Leicht, Michael (2000) A Reformed European Model: Social Capital as Competitive Advantage, Norderstedt: GRIN Verlag. • OECD (2007) DAC Handbook on Security System Reform: Supporting Security and Justice, Paris: OECD DAC. • O'Neill, John (2002) Ecology, Policy and Politics: Human Well-Being and the Natural World, London: Routledge. • Saveanu, Tomina et al. (2017) "Linking Business with Civil Society: The Bridging Role of CSR", in Sebastian Văduva‏, et al. (eds.) Civil Society: The Engine for Economic and Social Well-Being, Switzerland: Springer, 25-40. • Schmidt, Brian (2007) ‘Realism and facets of power in international relations’, in Felix Berenskoetter and M. J. Williams (eds.), Power in World Politics, London: Routlledge, 43-63. • Shils, Edward (2009) ”The Virtue of Civil Society”, in Virginia Hodgkinson‏, Michael Foley‏ (eds.), The Civil Society Reader, London: University Press of New England, 292-305. • Teets , Jessica (2014) Civil Society under Authoritarianism: The China Model, Cambridge: Camridge University Press. • Tilly, Charles (2005) Trust and Rule, New York: Cambridge University Press. • Tragardh, Lars, Witoszek, Nina (2013) "Introduction" in Lars Tragardh et al., (eds.) Civil Society in the Age of Monitory Democracy, Oxford: Berghahan, 1-21. • Verma, Vidhu (2002) Malaysia: State and Civil Society in Transition, Bolder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.