FLEXURAL BEHAVIOR OF FLY ASH BASED GEOPOLYMER REINFORCED CONCRETE T - BEAMS HAVING TRANSVERSE WEB OPENINGS

Mustafa Adel Saeed Civil Engineering Department, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq/ Master student.
Ali Sabah Al Amli Civil Engineering Department, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq/ PHD.

Abstract

Because of the massive CO2 emissions associated with cement manufacture, it is the primary cause of global warming. As a result, the writers and research organizations are motivated in multiple ways to find long-term solutions to this problem. The primary binder in geopolymer concrete is created by alkali activation some source materials such as fly ash, metakaoline, rice husk ash, and pulverized granulated blast furnace slag. Geopolymer concrete frequently has mechanical strength characteristics that are comparable to conventional concrete. The properties of the utilized source materials and the molar concentrations of the alkali activator, however, limit the application of this form of concrete. In this method, the relevant structural behavior can be studied. In addition, it is common that the transverse web openings may cause a relevant lack in structural behavior due to the inherent reduction of concrete within the existing section. The current study tries to investigate the flexural behavior of flay ash based geopolymer concrete by implementing an experimental program. Such program included casting and testing five fly ash geopolymer concrete T beams till failure. All the tested beams within this experimental program are of center to center span of 1600 mm and 1750 mm total length. The section dimensions are of total height of 250mm and flange width of 200mm while the while the web width is 100mm. The results showed that a lack of structural behavior can result from the presence of a transverse web opening in the center of geopolymer RC beams. The first cracking load, yielding load, and maximum load carrying capacity are all reduced when transverse web openings are present. In addition, the general performance of geopolymer T beams that have circular transverse web openings perform better than those that have square transverse web opening.

Keywords:

: Geopolymer, fly ash, metakaoline, slag, reinforced concrete beams and Structural Behavior


Full Text:

PDF


References


1) The presence of transverse web opening at the center of geopolymer RC beams can cause a consequent lack in structural behavior. 2) The load deflection response of geopolymer T beams is similar to conventional RC beams. 3) The presence of transverse web openings reduce the first cracking load, yielding load and maximum load carrying capacity. 4) The general performance of geopolymer T beams that have circular transverse web openings perform better than those that have square transverse web opening. 5) Further research is needed to include the rectangular transverse web openings. 6) Future research should be devoted to investigate the effect of the presence of transvers web openings at the effective shear zone. 7) the effect of the presence of transvers web openings at the effective shear zone. 5.References 1) Dattatreya J. K. and Rajamane N.(2011) P. (2011) “Flexural Behavior of Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete Beams,” International journal of civil and structural engineering, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp: 138-159. 2) Kumar B.S.H and K. Ramesh. (2018). "Analytical Study on Flexural Behaviour of Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete Beams by ANSYS." IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Vol. 455, No. 1. 3) Rangan B. V. (2010) “Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete,” Proceedings of the International Workshop on Geopolymer Cement and Concrete, Allied Publishers Private Limited, 2010. 4) Singh B., Ishwarya G., Gupta M., and Bhattacharyya S.K., (2015) “Geopolymer concrete: A review of some recent developments” Construction and Building Materials Vol. 85, pp: 78–90. 5) Li C, Sun H, and Li L.(2010) “A review the comparison between alkali-activated slag (Si+Ca) and metakaolin (Si+Al) cements” Cement and Concrete Research. Vol. No. 9., pp: 1341–1349. 6) BS EN 196-22013 Method of testing cement Chemical analysis of cement. 7) Iraqi Specifications No. (5). Portland cement. Baghdad, Iraq. “Iraqi Central Organization for Standardization and Quality Control”. Planning Council, Baghdad, Iraq. 1984. 8) BS 8821992 Specification for aggregates from natural sources for concrete (AMD 13579). 9) ASTM A 615/A 615M . Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Billet-Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement. American Society for Testing and Materials. 2013. 10) Aleem, Abdul & Arumairaj, P.D.. (2012). Optimum mix for the geopolymer concrete. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 5. 2299-2301. 10.17485ijst2012v5i3.8. 11) FA: Hersh F. Mahmood, Hooshang Dabbagh, Azad A. Mohammed, Comparative study on using chemical and natural admixtures (grape and mulberry extracts) for concrete, Case Studies in Construction Materials, Volume 15, 2021, 12) Kumar, S. (2022). A quest for sustainium (sustainability Premium): review of sustainable bonds. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, Vol. 26, no.2, pp. 1-18 13) Allugunti, V.R. (2019). Diabetes Kaggle Dataset Adequacy Scrutiny using Factor Exploration and Correlation. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, Volume-8, Issue-1S4, pp 1105-1110. 14) ASTM C39/C39M “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. American Society for Testing and Materials”. 15) ASTM C78 “Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third-Point Loading). American Society for Testing and Material”. 2015. 16) ASTM C469-14, “Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete in Compression”, 2014.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.