MEASURING SATISFACTION AND PERFORMANCE IN STUDYING ENGLISH USING E-LEARNING AMONG SECONDARY SCHOOL SUDENTS IN JORDAN

Abstract

The Corona pandemic has created a mandatory path for educational means to move towards e-learning, and this means a clear impact on students and the educational process in terms of efficiency, effectiveness and performance, so this paper aims to identify these effects on students, and to achieve the objectives of the research a methodology was developed to measure the impact on students’ performance by measuring and comparing student performance and satisfaction intrinsically in the English language at the secondary level, where the measurement was made through designing a questionnaire. The results showed that there was an increase in the improvement of the achievement performance of students, in addition to satisfaction with e-learning. As the results showed that the performance was more positive through achievement in favor of the year 2019 / 2020, which represents the year in which e-learning was implemented in Jordan.

Keywords:

:

: Traditional education, E-Learning.

Full Text:

PDF

References

References: o Brown, J. C., & Park, H. S. (2016). Longitudinal student research competency: Comparing online and traditional face-to-face learning platforms. Advances in Social Work, 17(1), 44-58. o Das, K. (2021). Integrating E-Learning & Technology in Mathematics Education. Journal of Information and Computational Science, 11(1), 310-319. o Díaz, L. A., & Entonado, F. B. (2009). Are the functions of teachers in e-learning and face-to-face learning environments really different?. Journal of educational technology & society, 12(4), 331-343. o Garcia, R., Falkner, K., & Vivian, R. (2018). Systematic literature review: Self-Regulated Learning strategies using e-learning tools for Computer Science. Computers & Education, 123, 150-163. o Kong, S. C., Chan, T. W., Griffin, P., Hoppe, U., Huang, R., Kinshuk, ... & Yu, S. (2014). E-learning in school education in the coming 10 years for developing 21st century skills: Critical research issues and policy implications. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 70-78. o Logan, R. M., Johnson, C. E., & Worsham, J. W. (2021). Development of an e-learning module to facilitate student learning and outcomes. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 16(2), 139-142. o Nicholson, P. (2007). A history of e-learning. In Computers and education (pp. 1-11). Springer, Dordrecht. o Paul, J., & Jefferson, F. (2019). A comparative analysis of student performance in an online vs. face-to-face environmental science course from 2009 to 2016. Frontiers in Computer Science, 1, 7. o Rajab, K. D. (2018). The effectiveness and potential of E-learning in war zones: An empirical comparison of face-to-face and online education in Saudi Arabia. IEEE Access, 6, 6783-6794. o Razzaque, A., & Hamdan, A. (2020, April). Internet of things for learning styles and learning outcomes improve e-learning: a review of literature. In The International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision (pp. 783-791). Springer, Cham. o Smith, D., & Hardaker, G. (2000). E-learning innovation through the implementation of an internet supported learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 3(3), 422-432. o So, W. W. M., Chen, Y., & Wan, Z. H. (2019). Multimedia e-learning and self-regulated science learning: A study of primary school learners’ experiences and perceptions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(5), 508-522.Seki, K., Tsukahara, W., & Okamoto, T. (2005, July). System development and practice of e-learning in graduate school. In Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'05) (pp. 740-744). IEEE. o Stansfield, M., McLellan, E., & Connolly, T. (2004). Enhancing student performance in online learning and traditional face-to-face class delivery. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 3(1), 173-188. o Summers, J. J., Waigandt, A., & Whittaker, T. A. (2005). A comparison of student achievement and satisfaction in an online versus a traditional face-to-face statistics class. Innovative Higher Education, 29(3), 233-250.

Refbacks

• There are currently no refbacks.