CUSTOMIZED PRIVACY BASED PERSONALIZED DOCUMENT RETRIEVAL FOR THE IMPROVED INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEM

Dr.P.Senthil Kumar Assistant Professor, senthilkumar@ajkcas.com
Dr.B.Suresh Kumar Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science, AJK College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore-641105, sureshkumar@ajkcas.com

Abstract

Information retrieval system plays a major role in the real world which aims to focus and retrieve the similar documents from the web sources that matches with the user query. In our previous research method fast and accurate retrieval of similar documents from the web sources is ensured by introducing the method namely Improved Information Retrieval System using Cooperative Ontological based User Profile Construction (IIRS-COUPC). However in this research method, privacy violation of the proposed research method doesn’t focused. And also this research method might degrade in its profile construction performance which is rectified in the proposed research methodology. This is focused and achieved in the proposed research method by introducing the Customized Privacy Based Personalized Document Retrieval (CPBPDR). In this research method, initially improved hierarchical user profile construction is performed to ensure the optimal retrieval of documents from the web sources in the faster way. And the user’s customized requirement about their privacy is gathered and it is ensured by hiding those customized requirements to the other users. The privacy is obtained by getting the privacy requirement from the users and then the corresponding privacy attributes are generalized. By doing so better privacy can be obtained by not leaking the information to the other users. This research method ensures the optimal, accurate and faster retrieval of matching documents from the web sources. The overall implementation of the proposed research method is done in the java simulation environment from which it is proved that the proposed research method leads to provide the optimal outcome than the existing research techniques with improved accuracy and lesser execution time.

Keywords:

:

customized privacy requirements, information retrieval system, hierarchical user profile, generalization

Full Text:

PDF


References


References: 1. Rosenfeld, L., &Morville, P. (2002). Information architecture for the World Wide Web.“O’Reilly Media, Inc.". 2. Bagheri, M. M. (2015). Intelligent and adaptive tutoring systems: How to integrate learners. International Journal of Education, 7(2), 1-16. 3. Cutting, D. R., Karger, D. R., Pedersen, J. O., &Tukey, J. W. (2017, August). Scatter/gather: A cluster-based approach to browsing large document collections. In ACM SIGIR Forum (Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 148-159).ACM. 4. Andriopoulou, F. G., Birkos, K., &Lymberopoulos, D. (2015). P2Care: A dynamic peer-to-peer network for collaboration in personalized healthcare service delivery. Computers in Industry, 69, 45-60. 5. Bouadjenek, M. R., Hacid, H., &Bouzeghoub, M. (2016). Social networks and information retrieval, how are they converging? A survey, taxonomy and an analysis of social information retrieval approaches and platforms. Information Systems, 56, 1-18. 6. Jannach, D., Lerche, L., &Jugovac, M. (2015, September). Adaptation and evaluation of recommendations for short-term shopping goals.In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (pp. 211-218).ACM. 7. Amatriain, X., &Pujol, J. M. (2015). Data mining methods for recommender systems.In Recommender systems handbook (pp. 227-262).Springer, Boston, MA. 8. Amatriain, X., &Pujol, J. M. (2015). Data mining methods for recommender systems.In Recommender systems handbook (pp. 227-262).Springer, Boston, MA. 9. Mai, J. E. (2016). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior.Emerald Group Publishing. 10. Rowley, J., & Hartley, R. (2017). Organizing knowledge: an introduction to managing access to information.Routledge. 11. Campos, R., Dias, G., Jorge, A. M., &Jatowt, A. (2015). Survey of temporal information retrieval and related applications. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 47(2), 15. 12. De Deyne, S., Navarro, D. J., Perfors, A., & Storms, G. (2016). Structure at every scale: A semantic network account of the similarities between unrelated concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(9), 1228. 13. Iacobacci, I., Pilehvar, M. T., &Navigli, R. (2015). Sensembed: Learning sense embeddings for word and relational similarity. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) (Vol. 1, pp. 95-105). 14. C. Shahabi, Y. Chen, “Automatically Improving the Accuracy of User Profiles with Genetic Algorithms”, In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual IASTED International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing(ASC2001), Cancun, Mexico, pp. 283-288, 2001. 15. J. Sun, H. Zeng, H. Liu, Y. Lu, and Z. Chen, “CubeSVD: A novel approach to personalized web search”, In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International World Wide Web Conference, ACM Press, pp. 382-390, 2005. 16. Z. Jrad, M. Aufaure, M. Hadjouni, “A Contextual User Model for Web Personalization”, In Proceedings of the Wise Workshops 2007, pp. 350-360, 2007. 17. H. Naderi, and B. Rumpler, “PERCIRS: a PERsonalized Collaborative. Information Retrieval System”, In Proceedings of the INFORSID, pp. 113-127, 2006. 18. J. Wang, Z. Li, J. Yao, Z. Sun, M. Li, and W. Ma, “Adaptive User Profile Model and Collaborative Filtering for Personalized News”, In Proceedings of the APWeb 2006, pp. 474-485, 2006

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.