DIVERSITY OF FISHES IN RELATION TO HABITAT OF FRESHWATER BHIMASANDRA POND IN TUMAKURU, KARNATAKA, INDIA.

Parimala B. Assistant Professor, Department of Zoology, University College of Science, Tumkur University, Tumakuru. India.572103 e.mail: parimala.bb@gmail.com

Abstract

The present investigation has been conducted during the period between January to December 2018 to assess the fish diversity profile in freshwater Bhimasandra pond in Tumakuru, Karnataka. It is a natural pond it catches runoff water from the surrounding area and also treated effluent water from water treatment plant is flowing into the pond. In this paper an attempt has been made to document fish biodiversity and composition of fish community in light of physical habitat quality. A total of 24 species belonging to 20 genera, 10 families and 6 orders were recorded. The groups of fishes include major carps (5 species), minor carps (1 species), carp minnows (2 species), Cat fishes (6 species) ornamental (1 species), larvicidal fishes (1 species), snake fishes (1 species), murrels (2 species) and other fishes (5 species). The major carps, murrels, catfishes, minor carps and other fishes are commercially important. Among the collected species Cyprinidae family was most dominant constituting 41.66% followed by Bagridae family with 12.50% of the total fish species. Carp fishes 34.78%, Catfishes 39.13% and miscellaneous fishes 26.09% were observed in the present study. All fishes are useful as food fishes except Ambassis and Gambusia, which are useful as ornamental and larvicidal fishes.

Keywords:

:

: Bhimasandra, Freshwater, Pond, Fish fauna, Effluent.

Full Text:

PDF


References


References: 1. Jhingran, V. G. (1982). “Fish and fisheries of India” Hindustan Publishing Corporation India. Delhi 2. Daniels, 2000 Pauly D, Christensen V. and Walters C (2000) “Ecopath, Ecosim and Ecospace as tools for evaluating ecosystem impact of fisheries” ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57: 697-706. 3. Hamilton-Buchanan. (1822). An account of the fishes found in the river Ganges and its branches. Edinburgh and London, VIII + 405, pp. 39. 4. Day and Francis. (1889). The fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma. Fishes 1: 548:2:509. The London, Taylor and Francis 5. Misra, S. (1962). An aid to the identification of the common commercial fishes of India and Pakistan. Rec. Indian Mus., 57(1-4): 320. 6. Jayaram, K.C., (1999). The freshwater fishes of Indian region. Narendra Publishing House, New Delhi. 7. Talwar, P.K., & Jhingran, A. (1991). Inland fishes of India and adjacent countries. Oxford and IBH Publishers, New Delhi. 8. Rao, L.M., Rao, G.V., & Sivani, G. (1999). Hydrobiology and ichthyofauna of Mehadrigedda stream of Visakhapathnam, Andhra Pradesh. Act. Biol., 13(1&2): 25-28. 9. Shannon C E and Wiener W, 1949. A mathematical theory of communication, Urbana, IL; University of Illinois Press. 10. Simpson E H, (1948). Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688-688. 11. Arunachalam, A., Sankaranarayanam, A., Maninekelan, A., Soranum, E., & Johnson, J.A. (2002). Journal of Bombay Natural History Society, 99(2): 337-341. 12. Yadav, B.E., 2000. The ichthyofauna of northern part of Western Ghats and its conservation. p. 145-147. 13. Yadav, B.E. (2003). Ichthyofauna of Northern part of Western Ghats. Occasional Paper No. 215, Zoological Survey of India 14. Chandrasekhar, A.V.A., (2004). Fish fauna of Hyderabad and its environments. Zoo’s Print Journal, 19(7): 1530-1533. 15. Chandra, G., Bhatta Charjee, I., Chatterji, S.N., & Ghosh, A. (2008). Indian Journal of Medical Research, Jan. 2008, 127(1): 13-27. 16. Khabade, S.A., & Mule, M.B. (2007). Fish diversity study of five waterbodies from Tasgaon tahsil of Sangli district, Maharashtra. Proceedings of National Workshop on Recent Trends in Biotechnology, 45-49. 17. Rosgen, D.L. (1996). Applied river morphology. Wildlife and Hydrology, Colorado, USA. 18. Anon (2000). Part of manual on habitat and biological inventory under and NATP germplasm inventory under gene banking of fresh water fishes. NBFGR, Lucknow. 19. Kristolic, J.L., Haynes, D.C., & Rahul, P.M. (2006). Physical habitat classification and in stream flow modeling to determine habitat availability during low-flow periods. North Fork Shenandoah river, Virginia. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigation Report, 2006-5025, p. 63. 20. Johal, M.S., (2002). Ecology of hill stream of Himachal Pradesh and Garhwal region with special reference to fish communities. Final Report of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 21. Gorman, O.T., & Karr, J.R. (1978). Habitat structure and stream fish communities. Ecology, 59: 507-515. 22. Angermeier, P.L., & Schlosser, I.J. (1989). Species-area relationships for stream fishes. Ecology, 70: 1450-1642. 23. Dey S. CV. and D. Kar, 1990). Fish yield trend in Sone, a tectonic lake of Assam. Matsya 15-16:39-43 24. Kar, D., Nagarathna, A.V., Ramachandra, T.V. and Dey, S.C., (2006). Fish diversity and conservation aspects in an aquatic ecosystem in North Eastern India. Zoo’s print Journal. 21(7): 2308-2315 25. Chookajorn, T., Ingkasuwan, O., & Pachuanchai, P. (2002). Fish population in the Pasak Jolasid reservoir. Thai. Fish Gaz. 55(2) : 121-132.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.