THE RELATIONSHIP OF SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY AND TURKISH THOUGHT

Nasriddin Nazarov Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor of Tashkent Institute of Architecture and Construction

Abstract

The article highlights the role of historical thought in the life of the individual, community, ethnos, nation and super ethnos as well, and also the fact that the perception of the individual is closely related to historical thought. In addition, it focuses on the role of historical thought in the gradual development of ideological factors in society. The interpretation of ideological concepts in historical sources, the creative aspects of the socio-historical development of the Turkic peoples have been covered, this factor has been reflected in The National ideological concepts. Furthermore, The National Idea which has been introduced into the society is directly derived from the historical thinking of the nation, which means that values are directly connected to this factor.

Keywords:

:

: historical thinking (thought), idea, Turkic peoples, creative idea, national interest, development, Motherland, people, noble goal.

Full Text:

PDF


References


References: 1. Narod v potoke istorii. Nauchnaya seriya /Sostaviteli T.Shanbay, A.Ibrayeva. – Astana: Folliant, 2014. – S. 145-146. 2. German Veys. Istoriya tsivilizatsii: arxitektura, voorujeniye, odejda, utvar: Illyustrirovannaya ensiklopediya v 3-x tomax. Klassicheskaya drevnost (do IV v.). T.1. – Moskva: Izd-vo EKSMO-Press, 2000. – S. 7. 3. Ushnitskiy V.V. Proisxojdeniye drevnix tyurkov-Ashina //Aktualniye voprosi istorii kyrgyzskogo naroda: proshloye, nastoyasheye i budusheye: Sbornik statey v chest 70 letiya kyrgyzskogo uchenogo-vostokoveda, professora Mokeyeva A.M. – Bishkek, 2019. – S. 166. 4. Klyashtorniy S.G. Kupchaki v runicheskikh pamyatnikakh //Turkologika. K vosmidesyatiletiyu akademika A.N.Kononova. – Leningrad, 1986. – S. 162. 5. Bichurin N.Ya. Sobraniye svedeniy o narodax, obitavshikh v Sredney Azii v drevniye vremena. – Moskva_Leningrad, 1950. – S. 102-103. 6. Iskakova M.K. Tamga kazakhov. – Almaty, 2012. – S. 79-80. 7. O‘zbekiston Milliy ensiklopediyasi. Tom 4. – Toshkent: «O‘zbekiston Milliy ensiklopediyasi», 2002. – B. 271. 8. Tuymebayev J.J., Yeskeyeva M. Turkitanudun tarixi-lingvistikaluk negizderi (Istoriko-lingvisticheskiye osnovi Tyurkologii). – Almaty, 2015. – B. 14. 9. Velikaya step: Materiali III Foruma gumanitarnix nauk. I-tom. – Astana, 2018. – S. 492. 10. Narod v potoke istorii. Nauchnaya seriya /Sostaviteli T.Shanbay, A.Ibrayeva. – Astana: Folliant, 2014. – S. 63-64. 11. Narod v potoke istorii. Nauchnaya seriya /Sostaviteli T.Shanbay, A.Ibrayeva. – Astana: Folliant, 2014. – S. 290. 12. Imomnazarov M. Milliy ma’naviyatimiz nazariyasiga chizgilar. – Toshkent: «Sharq», 1998. – B. 9. 13. Milliy istiqlol g‘oyasi. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Oliy ta’lim bakalavriat bosqichi uchun darslik. Mas’ul muharrir I.Ergashev. – Toshkent: «Akademiya», 2005. – B. 33. 14. Falsafa qomusiy lug‘at. – Toshkent: «Sharq», 2004. – B. 265-266. 15. Milliy g‘oya va taraqqiyot: maqolalar to‘plami. – Toshkent, 2003. – B. 29. 16. Falsafa: qomusiy lug‘at. – Toshkent: «Sharq», 2004. – B. 389. 17. Ochildiyev A. Milliy g‘oya va millatlararo munosabatlar. – Toshkent: «O‘zbekiston», 2004. – B. 15. 18. Muxamedov Sh.B. Nekotorie aspekti izucheniya istorii Sentralnoy Azii. – Tashkent: “Adabiyot uchqunlari”, 2016. – S. 6. 19. Nazarov Nasriddin. The role of history in reflecting the realities of the past in the context of Turkish runology //PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology. 2020. 17 (12), - P. 868-876 20. Nazarov Nasriddin. The analysis of Historical conditions in Turkic Runology //PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology. 2020. 17 (7), - P. 6744-6752 21. Nazarov Nasriddin. Socio-historical significance of Turkish runology promoting // Journal of Hunan University(Natural Sciences)湖南大学学报 (自然科学版), 2021. N 48 (12) – P. 1668-1675. 22. Nazarov Nasriddin. Relationship between the Ethnom" Sir" and the Syrdarya Hydronym in Orkhun Writing // Psychology and Education Journal, 2021. 58 (2), - P. 1319-1326. 23. Nazarov Nasriddin. Turkic Runology and its Historical Essence // Middle European Scientific Bulletin. Journal Impact Factor IFSIJ 5.43. 2021. April. Volume 11 (1). https: //cejsr.academicjournal.io/index.php/journal/article/view/384 24. Nazarov Nasriddin. The role of Orkhon-Yenisei written monuments in the development of historical thinking of the Turkic Peoples // Polish Science Journal (Issue 7(28), 2020) Warsaw: Sp. z o. o. "iScience", 2020. – Р. 28 – 34. 25. Nazarov Nasriddin. Some historical aspects of development of Uzbek ethnos in tne Afghanistan //Theoretical & Applied Science. Pliladelphia, USA. 2019. Issie 11, volume 79.November 30, . 2019. – P. 407 – 411. 26. Nazarov Nasriddin. Түркі бірлік және лақайлар өзара байланыстылық мәселелері.Turkic unity and lakays: problems of mutual relations //TDD/JofEL Yaz/Summer 2019/15 Tehlikedeki Diller Dergisi /Journal of Endangered Languages. www. tehlikedekidiller. com. TT_15-4(Listede 5)_FINAL. – P. 205 – 213. 27. Nazarov Nasriddin. Orkhon Inscriptions as a Subject of History for Study Ethnic Formation of Turks //The Journal of Eurasian Turkic Studies. Seoul, Republic of Korea, December, 2020. Vol. 5.– P. 145 – 158. 28. Nazarov Nasriddin. Some considerations on the teaching of the stages of Ethnic formation in the Science of History //Scientific magazine “Philosophy and Life”. № 3 (10). – Tashkent, 2020. – P. 77-89.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.